<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for ThruMyLens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thrumylens.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thrumylens.org</link>
	<description>Photography &#38; more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 18:27:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review of the Aimpoint 3x Magnifier by REVIEW: The Aimpoint 3X Magnifier&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; - XDTalk Forums - Your XD/XD(m) Information Source!</title>
		<link>http://thrumylens.org/featured/review-of-the-aimpoint-3x-magnifier/comment-page-1/#comment-71040</link>
		<dc:creator>REVIEW: The Aimpoint 3X Magnifier&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; - XDTalk Forums - Your XD/XD(m) Information Source!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 18:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thrumylens.org/?p=4970#comment-71040</guid>
		<description>[...] very pleased with the set up. I&#039;ve put together a written photo review that I thought I&#039;d share:  Review of the Aimpoint 3x Magnifier on ThruMyLens  Enjoy and do let me know your thoughts!     __________________ OWNER, ThruMyLens, LUXURY [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] very pleased with the set up. I&#039;ve put together a written photo review that I thought I&#039;d share:  Review of the Aimpoint 3x Magnifier on ThruMyLens  Enjoy and do let me know your thoughts!     __________________ OWNER, ThruMyLens, LUXURY [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review of the Springfield Armory EMP 9mm by John B. Holbrook, II</title>
		<link>http://thrumylens.org/featured/review-of-the-springfield-armory-emp-9mm/comment-page-1/#comment-71028</link>
		<dc:creator>John B. Holbrook, II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 16:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thrumylens.org/?p=4567#comment-71028</guid>
		<description>Bret - I don&#039;t disagree with you.  I sort of assume, as a function of shot placement, that the shooter has done their homework and purchased a gun that&#039;s a good fit for them and doesn&#039;t inhibit good shot placement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bret &#8211; I don&#8217;t disagree with you.  I sort of assume, as a function of shot placement, that the shooter has done their homework and purchased a gun that&#8217;s a good fit for them and doesn&#8217;t inhibit good shot placement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review of the Springfield Armory EMP 9mm by Brett</title>
		<link>http://thrumylens.org/featured/review-of-the-springfield-armory-emp-9mm/comment-page-1/#comment-71025</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 16:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thrumylens.org/?p=4567#comment-71025</guid>
		<description>If I can jump in on this discussion....

You both make good points. Shot placement is important, as is stopping power. But I personally feel that having a gun that fits your grip is more important yet. In defensive situations, you need a weapon that you feel confident and in control of. 

I own both the EMP in 9mm and a Kimber CDP Pro in .45ACP. Both are extremely accurate inside 15 yards, where any real defensive shooting would take place. I have owned the Kimber for about 10 years, and bought the EMP about 5 years ago, shortly after it was introduced. My intent was to have a 1911 style pistol that would be cheaper to shoot. Honestly, shooting .45ACP for an hour or two at the range adds up fast. I would often go through 200 rounds, costing up to $100 per session. The SA ammo saves me $50 each time. Well, it&#039;s more like $25 per session, since I split up the shooting between the two guns.

But the bottom line is, as much as I like the EMP, I shoot much better with the Kimber simply because it fits my hand better. My groups are noticeably tighter in comparable use. I can shoot faster while holding the same level of accuracy (or even better). 

As Rick described, I had a Marvel .22 conversion kit for the Kimber and used that a bit for a while. But I found that it wasn&#039;t comparable to shooting the real ammo due to the lack of recoil. If anything, it was teaching me bad habits. Eventually, I only used it when I brought a newcomer to the range and wanted to give them a more user-friendly introduction to shooting.

Bottom line: I think the EMP is a great gun, and is very comparable to a true 1911. The size difference in the hand is very minor and could be a plus or minus depending on your hand and preference. Fit and finish of the gun is outstanding. It is to the same level as the Kimber, with everything tight and functioning flawlessly. I&#039;ve used both for concealed carry and the EMP fits slightly better behind the hip, but the Kimber is slightly easier to draw. I&#039;d consider them about equal for different reasons. But if I had to choose just one gun, I&#039;d take the Kimber in .45ACP because it&#039;s the gun that I have more confidence in. I&#039;d just have to suck it up when it comes to resupplying ammo.

Fortunately, I don&#039;t have to choose. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I can jump in on this discussion&#8230;.</p>
<p>You both make good points. Shot placement is important, as is stopping power. But I personally feel that having a gun that fits your grip is more important yet. In defensive situations, you need a weapon that you feel confident and in control of. </p>
<p>I own both the EMP in 9mm and a Kimber CDP Pro in .45ACP. Both are extremely accurate inside 15 yards, where any real defensive shooting would take place. I have owned the Kimber for about 10 years, and bought the EMP about 5 years ago, shortly after it was introduced. My intent was to have a 1911 style pistol that would be cheaper to shoot. Honestly, shooting .45ACP for an hour or two at the range adds up fast. I would often go through 200 rounds, costing up to $100 per session. The SA ammo saves me $50 each time. Well, it&#8217;s more like $25 per session, since I split up the shooting between the two guns.</p>
<p>But the bottom line is, as much as I like the EMP, I shoot much better with the Kimber simply because it fits my hand better. My groups are noticeably tighter in comparable use. I can shoot faster while holding the same level of accuracy (or even better). </p>
<p>As Rick described, I had a Marvel .22 conversion kit for the Kimber and used that a bit for a while. But I found that it wasn&#8217;t comparable to shooting the real ammo due to the lack of recoil. If anything, it was teaching me bad habits. Eventually, I only used it when I brought a newcomer to the range and wanted to give them a more user-friendly introduction to shooting.</p>
<p>Bottom line: I think the EMP is a great gun, and is very comparable to a true 1911. The size difference in the hand is very minor and could be a plus or minus depending on your hand and preference. Fit and finish of the gun is outstanding. It is to the same level as the Kimber, with everything tight and functioning flawlessly. I&#8217;ve used both for concealed carry and the EMP fits slightly better behind the hip, but the Kimber is slightly easier to draw. I&#8217;d consider them about equal for different reasons. But if I had to choose just one gun, I&#8217;d take the Kimber in .45ACP because it&#8217;s the gun that I have more confidence in. I&#8217;d just have to suck it up when it comes to resupplying ammo.</p>
<p>Fortunately, I don&#8217;t have to choose. <img src='http://thrumylens.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review of the 4Sevens Quark X Series by John B. Holbrook, II</title>
		<link>http://thrumylens.org/featured/review-of-the-4sevens-quark-x-series/comment-page-1/#comment-71010</link>
		<dc:creator>John B. Holbrook, II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 14:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thrumylens.org/?p=3947#comment-71010</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re most welcome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re most welcome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review of the 4Sevens Quark X Series by Austin Hoops</title>
		<link>http://thrumylens.org/featured/review-of-the-4sevens-quark-x-series/comment-page-1/#comment-71009</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin Hoops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 14:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thrumylens.org/?p=3947#comment-71009</guid>
		<description>Thx for information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thx for information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Model Photo Shoot by Hieu</title>
		<link>http://thrumylens.org/photography/model-photo-shoot/comment-page-1/#comment-70931</link>
		<dc:creator>Hieu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 00:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thrumylens.org/?p=988#comment-70931</guid>
		<description>I just wanted to tell you your pictures are very beautiful and natural God Bless</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to tell you your pictures are very beautiful and natural God Bless</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review of the Zero Tolerance 0550 Tactical Knife by REVIEW: The Zero Tolerance 0550&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; - XDTalk Forums - Your XD/XD(m) Information Source!</title>
		<link>http://thrumylens.org/featured/review-of-the-zero-tolerance-0550-tactical-knife/comment-page-1/#comment-70723</link>
		<dc:creator>REVIEW: The Zero Tolerance 0550&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; - XDTalk Forums - Your XD/XD(m) Information Source!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 15:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thrumylens.org/?p=5042#comment-70723</guid>
		<description>[...] for the last few days - wrote up some thoughts and shot some photos on the topic. Have a look:  Review of the Zero Tolerance 0550 Tactical Knife &#124; ThruMyLens  Enjoy, and let me know what you think.     __________________ OWNER, ThruMyLens, LUXURY [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for the last few days &#8211; wrote up some thoughts and shot some photos on the topic. Have a look:  Review of the Zero Tolerance 0550 Tactical Knife | ThruMyLens  Enjoy, and let me know what you think.     __________________ OWNER, ThruMyLens, LUXURY [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review of the Hinderer XM-24 Tactical Knife by Review of the Zero Tolerance 0550 Tactical Knife &#124; ThruMyLens</title>
		<link>http://thrumylens.org/featured/review-of-the-hinderer-xm-24-tactical-knife/comment-page-1/#comment-70709</link>
		<dc:creator>Review of the Zero Tolerance 0550 Tactical Knife &#124; ThruMyLens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 15:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thrumylens.org/?p=4847#comment-70709</guid>
		<description>[...] month, I wrote an article about the Hinderer XM-24 I picked up.  Fantastic knife &#8211; it gave me a real appreciation for custom knife design and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] month, I wrote an article about the Hinderer XM-24 I picked up.  Fantastic knife &#8211; it gave me a real appreciation for custom knife design and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review of the Springfield Armory XD(m) 3.8 9mm Compact by John B. Holbrook, II</title>
		<link>http://thrumylens.org/firearms/review-of-the-springfield-armory-xdm-9mm-compact/comment-page-1/#comment-70409</link>
		<dc:creator>John B. Holbrook, II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 12:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thrumylens.org/?p=1769#comment-70409</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t really go wrong either way Bruce - just practice, practice, practice now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t really go wrong either way Bruce &#8211; just practice, practice, practice now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review of the Springfield Armory XD(m) 3.8 9mm Compact by Bruce</title>
		<link>http://thrumylens.org/firearms/review-of-the-springfield-armory-xdm-9mm-compact/comment-page-1/#comment-70252</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 02:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thrumylens.org/?p=1769#comment-70252</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s it! Its settled. I made up my mind. My first personal firearm will be a XDm 9mm 3.8  end of discussion i liked the XDsc 9mm and the crisp trigger of the S&amp;W MP 9mm sc but in the end the XDmc 9mm is the one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s it! Its settled. I made up my mind. My first personal firearm will be a XDm 9mm 3.8  end of discussion i liked the XDsc 9mm and the crisp trigger of the S&amp;W MP 9mm sc but in the end the XDmc 9mm is the one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

