subscribe: Posts | Comments

Review of the Smith & Wesson M&P 22 Pistol


Let’s face it – the shooting sports are expensive.  The equipment costs are substantial, but the cost of ammunition is a killer.  I generally shoot about 150 rounds a week on average – the Tuesday night competitive league I shoot in is 50 rounds a week, and I like to shoot another 100 practice rounds a week.  I used to go to Walmart a couple of times a month and buy their least expensive 50 round boxes of 9mm ammunition, which costs about $13.00 a box with tax.  So at Wal-Mart prices, it was costing me $156.00 a month just to shoot my 9mm….let alone my rifles or my shot gun.  I started buying bulk ammunition online which helped – I can get 1000 rounds for about $210.00 shipped.  That brings my monthly 9mm ammunition cost down to $126.00 – still a chunk of change.

When I got my Smith & Wesson M&P 15 (an AR-15 rifle), ammunition costs were even higher.  Fortunately, S&W makes a .22LR caliber version of this rifle called the M&P 15-22.  I’ve set up my M&P 15-22 identically (optic, trigger, grips) to its big brother and use it as a training gun.  My rifle shooting skills have dramatically improved over the last few months as a result, because I can shoot A LOT more with the 15-22.  Buying bulk, the .223 ammo my M&P 15 shoots costs about $.30 a round.  But .22LR rounds cost as little as $.3 a round for the cheap stuff, or about $.6 a round for the more expensive, higher precision rounds – a substantial savings using .22LR even at the high end of the scale.

Noting how much my skills improved, and my ammo costs reduced by shooting a .22LR training gun, I began to do some research into .22LR pistol options which would work as a low cost training alternative.  For training and competition, I primarily use a Springfield Armory XD(m) 4.5 9mm.  Ideally, I would have loved to have found a .22LR version of the XD(m) 9mm, but unfortunately Springfield Armory does not (as of this writing) manufacture such a firearm, nor is there any kind of a .22LR conversion kit available.  However, Smith & Wesson does make produce a .22LR version of their wildly popular M&P handguns called the M&P 22:

The M&P 22 was introduced by S&W at Shot Show 2011 and is currently in extremely short supply.  The M&P 22 is currently manufactured by the German manufacturer Walther for Smith & Wesson, so their production capability is somewhat limited.  I was extremely fortunate that I found one at a local dealer called Vandalia Tactical.  The M&P 22 retails for $419.00, but I was able to negotiate a modest discount with a purchase price of $416.00 including tax.  I didn’t push too hard on the price, given the lack of alternatives, and the potential ammunition costs savings I can realize by using the M&P 22.  My plan is to reduce my 9mm ammo consumption by 350 rounds a month.  So instead of shooting 600 rounds of 9mm, I’ll shoot 250 rounds o f9mm, and shoot 350 rounds of .22LR.  I figure my monthly pistol ammo bill will drop from $126.00 to about $63.00 – a 50% reduction which will allow me to recoup the price paid of the M&P 22 inside of seven months time.  Which means I’m money ahead within the first year of ownership.  Even better, if I want to shoot more, I can shoot another 550 rounds of .22LR for about $23.00 more.  Never did the words “no brainer” ever apply more to a buying decision.

Of course, all the dollar costing goes out the window if the M&P 22 does not provide a good, comparable shooting experience to shooting my 9mm, so the day I after I bought it, I headed to my local indoor gun range Sim-Trainer for some testing. I ran about 100 rounds of CCI Mini-Mag ammo through it, and experienced no failure to feeds, failure to ejects, or other mechanical failures.  The M&P 22 comes with only one 12-round magazine which was a bit of a disappointment.  Worse, it’s virtually impossible to find M&P magazines for sale anywhere (being an early adopter of a new to market product has disadvantages).  I was able to back order three M&P magazines directly from Smith & Wesson, which I’m told will be arriving from Walther in the first week of December.

Once I got a feel for the gun, I was performing as accurately with it as I normally do my 9mm.  Here’s one of my targets at 25t.:

Here’s another from 75 ft. (target set at the furthest point possible downrange):

My initial impressions from this first session were quite positive.  The M&P 22 is designed to be a nearly identical to the full-size M&P models chambered in 9mm, .40, and .45.  Holding the gun, it feels very comparable to holding my XD(m) 9mm – also a full size firearm.  Unlike the other M&P models, the M&P does not have interchangeable back straps to allow for a more precise, customized in-hand fit.  However, I found holding the M&P 22 quite comfortable despite my having relatively small hands.  As you might imagine, the M&P 22 is quite light for a full-size firearm, and the aluminum slide takes very little effort to retract.  Functionally though, the M&P handled very much like my 9mm XD(m).

Here’s a couple of photos which show the front and rear sights:

Initially I was not pleased with the dovetail style rear sights – the lack of white dots on the posts (which the front sight does have) means slower sight alignment.  When I shot the gun, the rear sights weren’t as bad as I had initially thought they might be, but I’m hoping that with time better aftermarket sights will be offered.

The following Saturday I decided to take out the M&P 22 for more extended test and did some practice shooting drills at the Miamisburg Sportsmen’s Club.  Here’s some video footage of the drills:

As you can see in the video, I used the least expensive .22LR ammo you can find – the .22LR Federal Value Pack.  Given that Walther manufacturers the M&P 22, I was quite concerned that it would have the same intolerance for cheap ammo which the Walther P22 is reputed to have.  However, I’m happy to report that I ran through an entire 550 round box and only had 3 or 4 failure to feeds – one of which was caught in the video. That’s perfectly acceptable to me – in fact, from a training perspective, an occasional mechanical failure has value.  You’ll see in the video I responded very quickly to the FTF and was able to continue through my training drill with no break in concentration.  If you never train to overcome mechanical failures, you’ll be at a distinct disadvantage if one occurs in a self-defense scenario.

The more I shot the M&P 22, the more I liked it – it’s very addictive to shoot too.  From a training perspective, you can practice everything needed for good marksmanship M&P 22 – stance, grip, sight alignment,  and trigger control.  I wouldn’t advocate abandoning training with your normal personal protection caliber handgun in lieu of the M&P 22, but augmenting it with this low-cost alternative will no doubt yield substantial benefits.  The only real alternatives out there to the M&P 22 are the aforementioned Walther P22 (very finicky with regard to ammo, and the trigger guard magazine release is too different from my other firearms) and the Sig Sauer Mosquito (also picky).  There are a couple of others (as well as a few .22LR conversion kits which are available for a few handguns chambered in traditional self-defense calibers).  But my point here is that there are few choices in this category.  The M&P 22 offers a higher magazine capacity (12 rounds vs. 10 for most other competitors) and is more reliable with a wider range of .22LR ammunition.  Definitely check it out!


About John B. Holbrook, II
John B. Holbrook, II is a freelance writer, photographer, and author of, as well as and *All text and images contained in this web site are the original work of the author, John B. Holbrook, II and are copyright protected. Use of any of the information or images without the permission of the author is prohibited.

  1. Very good write up…I real like the part about identifying how failures can help train for them..I’ve said this myself…you just don’t want so many to ruin your day.

    Again thanks for the time and energy in this review….I use an XDm 9 myself so this was very helpfull

  2. You are most welcome Tomaso – glad you found it of value!

  3. LYMAN ASHLEY says:

    Have purchased a MP 9mm and looking for the MP 22 for the same reasons. Also having problems finding one. Appreciate your breakdown of the cost of 22 vs 9mm ammo. I knew it was significant, but didn’t know it was that significant. Thanks for a valuable post.

  4. You’re most welcome!

  5. Have you shot any other bulk ammo in it yet, winchester 555 or 333, CCI blazer bulk? If so how was the reliability?

    How about Remington ammo? Have you tried any Remington ammonia any type? Reliability?

    How many total rounds are you up to? Hows the reliability overall?

    Thanks for the review and any reply!

  6. I haven’t tried any other ammo in it beyond what I talk about in the review. I’m well over 1000 rounds – reliability is superb!

  7. John,
    How large were the targets and groups.

  8. I didn’t measure precisely, but you can gauge that pretty well by looking at the photos.

  9. Thanks for the review. I’m off to purchase the M&P22 this weekend as I also have an M&P 9mm and want to save on the costs of ammo.

  10. You’re welcome James – do let me know how you like it! 🙂

  11. chris helton says:

    i also have a m&p 22 and love it so far shot 550 blazer bulk and this gun eats it no problems yet very accurate and just love the look of it feels great in hand

  12. I just ordered my M&P 22LR today along with 5000 rounds of 22LR ammo from I also shoot three 9mm pitsols (S&W M&P9, Glock-19, and Ruger LC-9) and the savings for me will amount to $1050.00 annually. So, yes, I will pay off the cost of the 22LR M&P in about 5 months. This will make my wife very happy and will allow me to go to the range more often with less resistance. My hope is that this will allow me to maintain a high degree of proficiency while still shooting about 150 rounds of 9mm per month (50 rounds in each weapon). The other reason I bought this weapon is because a friend has a Ruger MKII 22LR and he says they are very difficult to disassemble and clean. I am hoping that the S&W M&P 22LR will be just like my 9mm version. If so, it will be a win all around.

  13. The take down of the M&P 22 is VERY similar, though not exactly the same as the standard M&P handguns.

    Also, I had a look at the prices on and they weren’t that great (particularly for 9mm). Try

  14. WOW, I love my new M&P 22. Shoot a little differently than my M&P 9mm, but I still feel very confident that this is going to be my new practice gun. I’m calculation a good ratio of 100 shots from my M&P 22 to 10 shots from my M&P 9mm. Let the savings $$$$ BEGIN!

  15. I bought a M&P 22 a month ago and have had some failure to feed problems, mostly on the first round. With the slide locked back, then insert a mag, hit the release and the slide grabs the round but stops about halfway. if i push the end of the slide with my thumb it will usually fire the entire mag without a problem. do you have any recommendations?

  16. Okay, now that I’ve purchased my M&P 22 pistol, and LOVE IT, I was wondering if anyone has any experience purchasing a suppressor for it. I know you have to buy a suppressor adapter (about $45), but don’t know where to get the suppressor. I’ve looked around online, but haven’t found much. Any suggestions? And… do you know if it will render the sights useless or will you still be able to use the sites with the suppressor mounted? Thanks.

  17. Have you tried different brands of 22LR ammo? If so, I’d call up Smith and send it into them.

  18. Spike Dawg says:

    I’ve done the same thing. Had a SW 1911, chambered in .45. Too expensive and as a result, fewer times at the range. I don’t own safe queens, so I sold the 1911. I have a few .22s plus a SW M&P 15-22 all tricked out. I still like the 1911s, so I found a 1911 platform chambered for 9mm. Perfect solution. BTW, you wrote that .22 ammo is now costing you. “$.3 per shot.” I think you meant to say. $.03/shot.
    Safe shooting!
    Spike Dawg

  19. I recently purchased a M&P .22 pistol and I have put about 300 rounds through it. I had some problems with failure to feed on the first round and also it won’t work when I load a round in the chamber and have 12 rounds in the magazine. I have used Federal Bulk Pack from Walmart, Remington 225 pack and CCI mini mags. No matter what types ammo I have tryed, I get the same result. I’m gonna take it back to where I got it from or send it to Smith & Wesson. However, given all of the feeding problems, I still love the overall feel and shout ability of the gun. I hope I’m able to get this problem fixed ASAP!

  20. Smith will take care of you – no worries!

  21. I have a M&P 22LR and love it. I am 65 yrs old and called Smith and Wesson to see about rear sights. They sent me ( no charge ) M&P 9mm sights and they were a easy fix. Great gun. I have a Glock 26, a Bersa 22LR and a Phoenix Arms 22LR . The Bersa is picky on ammo , the phoenix arms shoots anything as well as my M&P 22LR. I paid $ 329.00 for mine at a sports shop in Griffith Indiana.

  22. John,

    I purchased the same pistol a couple months ago at Cabelas. My first clip I had a feed problem. About 500 rounds later it has performed flawlessly. I really enjoy this pistol. I was curious if you know anywhere you can buy an extended magazine. I have searched the Internet with no luck. Thanks in advance for your help.

  23. Hi Justin,

    As far as I know, S&W is the only manufacturer of magazines for the M&P 22, and their 12 models are the highest capacity available. I like it that way personally – I carry an M&P 9c that has a 12 round magazine. So training with the M&P 22 and doing mag changes with it is that much more of a similar experience to my carry gun.

  24. Gary Baker says:

    Go to Smith& and order. They are $ 30.00 each two weeks before Christmas. I bought two more. They were ten round however. I took off the base plate and took off a little piece of black plastic that was on it and made it a twelve round.

  25. I am just getting into competitive shooting. I have found one of these at a local dealer and have found nothing but good reviews on the gun itself. As i am new to the competitive scene would this be a good fit for .22 steels competitions? Those competitions are what i am aiming towards in particular. I was told by the dealer that this would work well for a beginner in competitive steels shooter, but would love your thoughts after reading this review i can tell your knowledge is vast in the shooting world. I would greatly appreciate it.

  26. Brent – if we had any .22 steel competitions locally, I wouldn’t hesitate to use the M&P .22.

  27. Thank you for the review. Ive had my M&P 22 for a couple months now and I love it! I saw your other review on the Dawson Precison sights and will be getting some of those as well. The only problem I am having is that is shoots about 4 inchs high. I think this is a common problem that people have 22plinkster on youtube did a review and had the same issue. Im hoping Dawson will fix that problem for me.

  28. Thanks! Glad you enjoyed the review. 😀


  1. REVIEW: The Smith & Wesson M&P 22 (photos and video)>>>>>>>>> - [...] REVIEW: The Smith & Wesson M&P 22 (photos and video)>>>>>>>>> Here's my review of…
  2. REVIEW: The S&W M&P 22 Pistol>>>>>>>>> - XDTalk Forums - Your XD/XD(m) Information Source! - [...] Just picked up one of these and posted up my review: Review…
  3. SR22P vs P22 - brief review - Page 4 - WaltherForums - [...] not made in Koln by Umarex? Rental Gun Stress Test Part 2: S&W M&P22 | Gun Nuts…
  4. Moving Over To The Smith & Wesson M&P 9c | ThruMyLens - [...] 9mm for home protection and range use, a Ruger SR9c for conceal carry, and I also just picked up…
  5. Review of Winchester's M-22 Rimfire .22LR Ammunition | ThruMyLens - [...] the useage of .22LR rimfire weapons as a critical part of my training.  I have two firearms (the M&P…
  6. Review of the Dawson Precision Fiber Optic Sites for the S&W M&P 22 | ThruMyLens - [...] I consider it an important training tool, and a fun gun to shoot as well.  But, as I mentioned…

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: