When Robert King of Red Hill Tactical recently announced on Facebook that he had procured an MPX magazine for the purpose of making magazine holsters for the MPX, I quickly placed an order. Red Hill Tactical is a name that many in the practical shooting community are familiar with for making custom Kydex products. Earlier this year I ordered a custom Kydex holster for my SIG P320 Compact which I shoot in competition, and couldn’t be more pleased with it, so I was optimistic.
It took a couple of weeks for him to start sending out the first batch of MPX mag holsters, but I believe I was one of the first to receive one. Here’s a photo of the RHT mag holster (left) next to the SIG OEM mag holster made by Blade-Tech (right):
The RHT holster has a more custom/handmade appearance than the clean lines of the OEM holster, and it’s a bit larger and thicker, though not noticably heavier. I also ordered it with the optional silver retention adjustment screws. Out of the box (or bag as it were) the RHT holster had almost zero retention – great if you’re on a “stand and deliver” type stage with not a lot of movement. But if it’s a stage where you’ll be running around aggressively, you’ll surely lose a magazine so I’m glad I sprang for the retention adjustment screws – I tightened them down just a tad. The RHT holster also appears to be quite a bit more robust with a higher build quality:
This price difference between the SIG OEM mag holster and the RHT made mag holster is significant. I’ve picked up the SIG model for as little as $15.00 on sale plus shipping, while the RHT model I ordered was $41.75. Fortunately, in both 3GN and USPSA, having a 40-round magazine in the gun, and one in my holster will get me through the majority of stages. I don’t think most people will need more than one of these. I’ll hang on to my SIG OEM holsters to use as backup or in those rare cases a stage calls for more than 80 rounds. If you’re a PCC competitor with an MPX, and need a good competition magazine holster, give Red Hill Tactical a look.
0 Comments